Compare ยท MCP gateways
PrivacyFence and other MCP gateways: different jobs.
Most MCP gateways sit between many AI agents and many MCP servers, and give a platform team one place for sign-in, access rules, rate limits and logs. PrivacyFence is an MCP gateway with a narrower job: it governs its own connectors to business systems, and puts the person whose data it is in front of each sensitive read and write. The FAQ has the short version.
Checked against each project's documentation on 29 September 2026. The sources are at the end of this page.
Examples
Gateways we looked at.
What each project's documentation describes. "Not described" means we did not find it there, not that it cannot be built.
Which one
Often both, for different traffic.
A general gateway fits when
- you run many internal MCP servers and need one place to route, authenticate and rate-limit them;
- automatic scanning and central logs are the controls you need;
- a platform team, not each user, owns the decisions.
PrivacyFence fits when
- assistants work with personal mailboxes, drives, chats and customer records;
- a person should see the content and approve before it is released or changed;
- credentials and the record of decisions should stay on computers you control.
PrivacyFence governs only its own connectors, so tools from your other MCP servers keep going through whatever gateway you use for them.
Sources
Where the comparison comes from.
Spotted something out of date? Write to [email protected] and it will be corrected.